live pantyhose webcam - Radiometric dating relative dating

It is possible that these rates changed — but under uniformitarianism, which is necessary for science to function, we must assume that rates did not change unless there is evidence for this change.Second, creationists appeal to the Omphalos hypothesis and argue that God deceptively created the world to appear old.

This is, however, still over 4,000 years older than the creationist figure for the age of the Earth.

Dendrochronology is a method of dating based on annual tree growth patterns called tree rings.

The oldest plant alive has been dated back as far as 11,700 years (7367 years too old) and is called King Clone.

King Clone's age is not precise to a given year, as it wasn't dated by dendrochronology proper (counting rings).

When one of these minerals is heated, the trapped electrons are discharged and produce light, and that light can be measured and compared with the level of surrounding radiation to establish the amount of time that has passed since the material was last heated (and its trapped electrons were last released).

Although this technique can date objects up to approximately 230,000 years ago, is only accurate on objects 300 to 10,000 years in age.

(For example, all dating methods for the age of the Earth agree on a 4.4-4.6 billion year-old world.) This is important especially because YECs regularly claim that radiometric dating is unreliable — yet radiometric dating is unnecessary to prove an old universe, because we have many methods of dating at our disposal.

What follows is 33 independent reasons not to believe in creationism: Evidence for a minimum age of 10 thousand years.

Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 2012 Digital Edition © William Collins Sons & Co.

The evidence against a recent creation is overwhelming.

All of this evidence supports deep time: the idea, considered credible by scientists since the early 1800s, that the Earth (and the Universe) is millions or billions of years old.

Tags: , ,